Construction · Lesson 05
Choose stories and build coverage
Inspect evidence breadth and reuse risk without imposing an arbitrary story count or readiness percentage.
What you will learn
- Inspect evidence breadth and reuse risk without imposing an arbitrary story count or readiness percentage.
Cover situations, not keywords
Map stories across delivery, failure, conflict, ambiguity, influence, customer impact, technical judgment, mentoring, and ethics. One strong story can support several questions, but it should not become the answer to everything.
- Include success and failure.
- Include individual execution and influence through others.
- Include technical and interpersonal evidence.
Use descriptive states
Call an area uncovered when no story maps to it, thin when only one story carries it, and covered when independent evidence exists. These labels say nothing about hire probability.
- Name the next evidence gap.
- Flag a story reused across many questions.
- Prefer a second event over changing the first event's facts.
A concentrated story bank
Five delivery questions and four influence questions all point to one launch story.
Nine mappings means the candidate is highly prepared.
Delivery evidence exists, but reuse is concentrated. Conflict and failure have no independent event, so the next action is to prepare one truthful example from either area.
- Counts remain inspectable.
- No readiness percentage is inferred.
- The recommendation identifies a missing evidence family.
Map three real stories across at least six question families.
- 1Mark uncovered and thin families.
- 2Circle any story used six or more times.
- 3Choose one next story based on missing evidence, not an arbitrary quota.
Open the answer check
A useful map yields a specific next evidence action and makes reuse concentration visible without rating your personality or potential.
Finish this lesson
Record completion when you have worked through the material. Completion is learning progress, not evidence of mastery.
Loading completion…